New Urbanism is an aesthetic gimmick that imposes an architecture
as restrictive as the very housing stock it proposes to replace.
suburb bashing is tried and tiring.
how then dose one build meaning in suburbia?
is there something worth saving?
is usage in fact more variant, vibrant and sustainable than the built form suggests?
what if infrastructure could be like an arm of the official city,
reaching branching into to every community,
connecting the desperate pockets of activity
into something more than the sum of its parts -
a collective consciousness?
No comments:
Post a Comment